Sonia Gandhi, the last foreign invader ruler and her anti Hindu policies

Moghul invaders , British invaders and Sonia’s congress Invaders

Sonia Gandhi, the chairperson of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA), is  the last foreign invader  ruler of India, a label that reflects the perception of her leadership style and political strategies.  Her approach mirrors the tactics employed by historical invaders, such as the Mughals and the British, particularly in terms of fostering divisions within Indian society along religious lines. This perspective suggests that her political maneuvers are not merely about governance but are deeply rooted in a desire to consolidate power by appealing to specific religious communities, particularly Muslims and Christians, at the expense of Hindu sentiments.

   One of the most controversial aspects of her tenure has been the rhetoric surrounding Hinduism. For instance, Mr. Sushil Kumar Shinde, who served as the Home Minister under her leadership, introduced the term “Hindu terrorism,” a phrase that many believe unfairly stigmatizes a vast majority of the population and to appease minorities. This narrative was further compounded by Shiv Raj Patil, another former Home Minister, who made disparaging comments about the Bhagavad Gita, likening it to jihad—a statement that many Hindus found deeply offensive and dismissive of their faith. Additionally, the current party president, Mallikarjun Kharge, has publicly mocked the Kumbh Mela, one of Hinduism’s most significant religious gatherings, further alienating a substantial segment of the electorate. Many controversial bills and acts in parliament during UPA rule were made appease minorities for thew sake of votes. Sri.Pranab Mukherjee was denied Prime minister ship by Sonia Gandhi because he was Hindu.

These actions are perceived as part of a broader strategy by Sonia Gandhi to fortify her political standing among minority communities by adopting an anti-Hindu stance. This approach is reminiscent of historical patterns where invaders sought to undermine the dominant religious and cultural identity of the land to facilitate their own rule.

  The Mughals, for instance, often resorted to forced conversions and the destruction of temples to assert their dominance, while the British colonial  Invader regime exploited India’s resources and promoted Christian missionary activities under the guise of benevolence, which also aimed at converting Hindus.

   The parallels drawn between Sonia Gandhi’s political strategies and those of historical invaders suggest a continuity of tactics aimed at weakening Hindu identity to consolidate power. However, unlike their predecessors, Sonia and her son Rahul Gandhi appear to have miscalculated the political landscape. Rahul Gnadhi took his anti Hindu stand by moking Lord Shiva the Hindu God in parliament whis was unprecedented.

Their anti-Hindu rhetoric and actions have not only alienated a significant portion of the Hindu electorate but have also sparked a backlash that has galvanized Hindu nationalist sentiments across the country. This misalignment with the cultural and religious sentiments of the majority has led to a decline in their political fortunes of congress and Sonia Gandhi, indicating that the strategy of division may ultimately be counter productive for these foreign invaders.